Search: id:A110312
Results 1-1 of 1 results found.
%I A110312
%S A110312 4,1,6,5,7,5,9,7,10,6,11,10,11,11,12,12,15,14
%N A110312 Minimal number of polygonal pieces in a dissection of a regular n-gon
to a square (conjectured).
%C A110312 I do not know which of these values have been proved to be minimal.
%C A110312 Turning over is allowed. The pieces must be bounded by simple curves
to avoid difficulties with non-measurable sets.
%D A110312 N. J. A. Sloane, Seven Staggering Sequences, in Homage to a Pied Puzzler,
E. Pegg Jr., A. H. Schoen and T. Rodgers (editors), A. K. Peters,
Wellesley, MA, 2009, pp. 93-110.
%D A110312 G. N. Frederickson, Dissections: Plane and Fancy, Cambridge, 1997.
%D A110312 H. Lundgren, Geometric Dissections, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1964.
%D A110312 H. Lundgren (revised by G. N. Frederickson), Recreational Problems in
Geometric Dissections and How to Solve Them, Dover, NY, 1972.
%H A110312 Henry Baker, A 5-piece dissection of a hexagon
to a square [From HAKMEM]
%H A110312 Henry Baker,
Hypertext version of HAKMEM
%H A110312 Stewart T. Coffin, Dudeney's 1902 4-piece dissection
of a triangle to a square, from The Puzzling World of Polyhedral
Dissections.
%H A110312 Stewart T. Coffin,
The Puzzling World of Polyhedral Dissections, link to part of
Chapter 1.
%H A110312 Geometry Junkyard, Dissection
%H A110312 N. J. A. Sloane,
Seven Staggering Sequences.
%H A110312 Gavin Theobald, Square dissections
%H A110312 Vinay Vaishampayan, Dudeney's 1902 4-piece dissection
of a triangle to a square
%e A110312 a(3) <= 4 because there is a 4-piece dissection of an equilateral triangle
into a square, due probably to H. Dudeney, 1902 (or possible C. W.
McElroy - see Fredricksen, 1997, pp. 136-137). Surely it is known
that this is minimal? See illustrations.
%e A110312 Coffin gives a nice description of this dissection. He notes that the
points marked * are the mid-points of their respective edges and
that ABC is an equilateral triangle. Suppose the square has side
1, so the triangle has side 2/3^(1/4). Locate B on the square by
measuring 1/3^(1/4) from A, after which the rest is obvious.
%e A110312 a(4) = 1 trivially.
%e A110312 a(5) <= 6 since there is a 6-piece dissection of a regular pentagon into
a square, due to R. Brodie, 1891 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 120.
Certainly a(5) >= 5. Is it known that a(5) = 5 is impossible?
%e A110312 a(6) <= 5 since there is a 5-piece dissection of a regular hexagon into
a square, due to P. Busschop, 1873 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 117).
(See illustration.) Is it known that a(6) = 4 is impossible?
%e A110312 a(7) <= 7 since there is a 7-piece dissection of a regular 7-gon into
a square, due to G. Theobald, 1995 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 128).
Is it known that a(7) = 6 is impossible?
%e A110312 a(8) <= 5 since there is a 5-piece dissection of a regular 8-gon into
a square, due to G. Bennett, 1926 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 150).
Is it known that a(8) = 4 is impossible?
%e A110312 a(9) <= 9 since there is a 9-piece dissection of a regular 9-gon into
a square, due to G. Theobald, 1995 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 132).
Is it known that a(9) = 8 is impossible?
%e A110312 For n >= 10 see the Theobald web site.
%Y A110312 Cf. A110000, A110356.
%Y A110312 Sequence in context: A115607 A076717 A120422 this_sequence A011242 A008565
A021100
%Y A110312 Adjacent sequences: A110309 A110310 A110311 this_sequence A110313 A110314
A110315
%K A110312 nonn
%O A110312 3,1
%A A110312 N. J. A. Sloane (njas(AT)research.att.com), Sep 11 2005
Search completed in 0.001 seconds