Search: id:A110312 Results 1-1 of 1 results found. %I A110312 %S A110312 4,1,6,5,7,5,9,7,10,6,11,10,11,11,12,12,15,14 %N A110312 Minimal number of polygonal pieces in a dissection of a regular n-gon to a square (conjectured). %C A110312 I do not know which of these values have been proved to be minimal. %C A110312 Turning over is allowed. The pieces must be bounded by simple curves to avoid difficulties with non-measurable sets. %D A110312 N. J. A. Sloane, Seven Staggering Sequences, in Homage to a Pied Puzzler, E. Pegg Jr., A. H. Schoen and T. Rodgers (editors), A. K. Peters, Wellesley, MA, 2009, pp. 93-110. %D A110312 G. N. Frederickson, Dissections: Plane and Fancy, Cambridge, 1997. %D A110312 H. Lundgren, Geometric Dissections, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1964. %D A110312 H. Lundgren (revised by G. N. Frederickson), Recreational Problems in Geometric Dissections and How to Solve Them, Dover, NY, 1972. %H A110312 Henry Baker, A 5-piece dissection of a hexagon to a square [From HAKMEM] %H A110312 Henry Baker, Hypertext version of HAKMEM %H A110312 Stewart T. Coffin, Dudeney's 1902 4-piece dissection of a triangle to a square, from The Puzzling World of Polyhedral Dissections. %H A110312 Stewart T. Coffin, The Puzzling World of Polyhedral Dissections, link to part of Chapter 1. %H A110312 Geometry Junkyard, Dissection %H A110312 N. J. A. Sloane, Seven Staggering Sequences. %H A110312 Gavin Theobald, Square dissections %H A110312 Vinay Vaishampayan, Dudeney's 1902 4-piece dissection of a triangle to a square %e A110312 a(3) <= 4 because there is a 4-piece dissection of an equilateral triangle into a square, due probably to H. Dudeney, 1902 (or possible C. W. McElroy - see Fredricksen, 1997, pp. 136-137). Surely it is known that this is minimal? See illustrations. %e A110312 Coffin gives a nice description of this dissection. He notes that the points marked * are the mid-points of their respective edges and that ABC is an equilateral triangle. Suppose the square has side 1, so the triangle has side 2/3^(1/4). Locate B on the square by measuring 1/3^(1/4) from A, after which the rest is obvious. %e A110312 a(4) = 1 trivially. %e A110312 a(5) <= 6 since there is a 6-piece dissection of a regular pentagon into a square, due to R. Brodie, 1891 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 120. Certainly a(5) >= 5. Is it known that a(5) = 5 is impossible? %e A110312 a(6) <= 5 since there is a 5-piece dissection of a regular hexagon into a square, due to P. Busschop, 1873 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 117). (See illustration.) Is it known that a(6) = 4 is impossible? %e A110312 a(7) <= 7 since there is a 7-piece dissection of a regular 7-gon into a square, due to G. Theobald, 1995 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 128). Is it known that a(7) = 6 is impossible? %e A110312 a(8) <= 5 since there is a 5-piece dissection of a regular 8-gon into a square, due to G. Bennett, 1926 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 150). Is it known that a(8) = 4 is impossible? %e A110312 a(9) <= 9 since there is a 9-piece dissection of a regular 9-gon into a square, due to G. Theobald, 1995 - see Fredricksen, 1995, p. 132). Is it known that a(9) = 8 is impossible? %e A110312 For n >= 10 see the Theobald web site. %Y A110312 Cf. A110000, A110356. %Y A110312 Sequence in context: A115607 A076717 A120422 this_sequence A011242 A008565 A021100 %Y A110312 Adjacent sequences: A110309 A110310 A110311 this_sequence A110313 A110314 A110315 %K A110312 nonn %O A110312 3,1 %A A110312 N. J. A. Sloane (njas(AT)research.att.com), Sep 11 2005 Search completed in 0.001 seconds