|
Search: id:A104857
|
|
|
| A104857 |
|
Positive integers which cannot be represented as the sum of distinct Lucas 3-step numbers (A001644). |
|
+0
1
|
|
| 2, 5, 6, 9, 13, 16, 17, 20, 23, 26, 27, 30, 34, 37, 38, 41, 44, 45, 48, 52, 55, 56, 59, 62, 65, 66, 69, 73, 76, 77, 80, 84, 87, 88, 91, 94, 97, 98, 101, 105, 108, 109, 112, 115, 116, 119, 123, 126, 127, 130, 133, 136, 137, 140, 144, 147, 148, 151, 154
(list; graph; listen)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,1
|
|
|
COMMENT
|
Similar to A054770 "Numbers that are not the sum of distinct Lucas numbers (A000204)" but with Lucas 3-step numbers (A001644). Wanted: equivalent of David W. Wilson conjecture (A054770) as proved by Ian Agol. Note that all positive integers can be presented as the sum of distinct Fibonacci numbers in A000119 way. Catalani called Lucas 3-step numbers "generalized Lucas numbers" but that is quite ambiguous. These are also called Tribonacci-Lucas numbers.
|
|
LINKS
|
Eric Weisstein's World of Mathematics, Lucas n-Step Number.
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
In "base Lucas 3-step numbers" we can represent 1 as "1", but cannot represent 2 because there is no next Lucas 3-step number until 3 and we can't have two instances of 1 summed here. We can represent 3 as "10" (one 3 and no 1's), 4 as "11" (one 3 and one 1). Then we cannot represent 5 or 6 because there is no next Lucas 3-step number until 7 and we can't sum two 3s or six 1's. 7 becomes "100" (one 7, no 3s and no 1's), 8 becomes "101" and so forth.
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Cf. A000119, A001644, A054770.
Sequence in context: A151920 A160714 A094350 this_sequence A055198 A103982 A030488
Adjacent sequences: A104854 A104855 A104856 this_sequence A104858 A104859 A104860
|
|
KEYWORD
|
easy,nonn
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Jonathan Vos Post (jvospost3(AT)gmail.com), Apr 24 2005
|
|
EXTENSIONS
|
More terms from T. D. Noe, Apr 26 2005
|
|
|
Search completed in 0.002 seconds
|
