|
Search: id:A114617
|
|
|
| A114617 |
|
Numbers n such that n and n+1 are both refactorable numbers. |
|
+0 6
|
|
| 1, 8, 1520, 50624, 62000, 103040, 199808, 221840, 269360, 463760, 690560, 848240, 986048, 1252160, 1418480, 2169728, 2692880, 2792240, 3448448, 3721040, 3932288, 5574320, 5716880, 6066368, 6890624, 6922160, 8485568
(list; graph; listen)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,2
|
|
|
COMMENT
|
It is not possible to have three consecutive refactorable numbers (see the link). The sequence is best viewed in base 12, with X for 10 and E for 11: 1, 8, X68, 25368, 2EX68, 4E768, 97768, X8468, 10EX68, 1X4468, 293768, 34XX68, 3E6768, 504768, 584X68, 887768, X9X468, E27X68, 11X3768, 12E5468, 1397768, 1X49X68, 1XE8468, 2046768, 2383768, 2399X68, 2X12768. After the first two terms all terms are 68, 368, 468, 668, 768, X68 mod 1000 (base 12). - Walter Kehowski (wkehowski(AT)cox.net), Jun 19 2006
No successive refactorables seem to be of the form odd, odd+1. If such a pair exist, they must be very large. The first pair of successive refactorables not divisible by 3 is (5*19)^4-1, (5*19)^4. - Walter Kehowski (wkehowski(AT)cox.net), Jun 25 2006
|
|
LINKS
|
Eric Weisstein's World of Mathematics, Refactorable Number
|
|
FORMULA
|
a(n) mod tau(a(n)) = 0 and (a(n)+1) mod tau(a(n)+1) = 0 where tau(n) is the number of divisors of n. - Walter Kehowski (wkehowski(AT)cox.net), Jun 19 2006
|
|
MAPLE
|
with(numtheory); RFC:=[]: for w to 1 do for k from 1 to 12^6 do n:=144*k+(6*12+8); if andmap(z-> z mod tau(z) = 0, [n, n+1]) then RFC:=[op(RFC), n]; print(n); fi od od; # it is possible to remove the condition n = (6*12+8) mod 12^2 but you'll get the same sequence. - Walter Kehowski (wkehowski(AT)cox.net), Jun 19 2006
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Cf. A033950.
Cf. A033950, A036898, A114617.
Adjacent sequences: A114614 A114615 A114616 this_sequence A114618 A114619 A114620
Sequence in context: A088080 A064073 A096970 this_sequence A017295 A050642 A050648
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nonn
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Eric Weisstein (eric(AT)weisstein.com), Dec 16, 2005
|
|
|
Search completed in 0.002 seconds
|